{"id":159675,"date":"2023-05-17T02:20:35","date_gmt":"2023-05-17T02:20:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/culture.org\/?p=159675"},"modified":"2023-05-18T02:21:01","modified_gmt":"2023-05-18T02:21:01","slug":"ai-hoax-article-fools-historic-irish-newspaper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/culture.org\/special-interest\/ai-hoax-article-fools-historic-irish-newspaper\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Hoax Article Fools Historic Irish Newspaper"},"content":{"rendered":" \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n
<\/p>\n
The Irish Times, a venerable 164-year-old newspaper, recently made a public apology for publishing a controversial op-ed purportedly written by a young Latinx immigrant to Ireland.<\/span><\/p>\n The paper revealed that the piece was a sham, created using generative AI technology, by an individual who was not who they claimed to be.<\/span><\/p>\n The sham article titled “Irish women\u2019s obsession with fake tan is problematic,” was supposedly penned by an Ecuadorian immigrant named Adriana Acosta-Cortez.<\/span><\/p>\n It controversially accused white Irish women who use fake tans of cultural appropriation. The piece was published on May 11, complete with an AI-generated photo of the supposed author sporting blue hair.<\/span><\/p>\n Ruadh\u00e1n Mac Cormaic, the Editor of the Irish Times, took responsibility for the incident, calling it a “deliberate and coordinated deception,” and a breach of the trust between the newspaper and its readers.<\/span><\/p>\n He committed to strengthening pre-publication procedures and said that the incident highlighted the challenges posed by generative AI to news organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n Despite the thorough editorial process, including back-and-forth discussions with the hoaxer, the Irish Times was unable to detect the scam until after the article’s publication.<\/span><\/p>\n The hoaxer had effectively used personal anecdotes and updated the piece with links to research, fooling the editorial team.<\/span><\/p>\n Adding to the newspaper’s embarrassment, a Twitter account was set up in the fake author’s name, Acosta-Cortez, which interacted with readers and commented on the incident.<\/span><\/p>\n The account criticized the Irish Times for publishing the article to generate website traffic, diverting attention from the AI’s role in the deception.<\/span><\/p>\n Ruadh\u00e1n Mac Cormaic, the Editor of the Irish Times, took responsibility for the incident, calling it a “deliberate and coordinated deception,” and a breach of the trust between the newspaper and its readers.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span>\r\n\r\n The individual behind the Twitter account identified themselves as an Irish, non-binary college student to The Guardian.<\/span><\/p>\n They revealed that the Acosta-Cortez persona was created using a repurposed Twitter account, which had been made to appear legitimate by following Ecuadorian outlets and using some Spanish.<\/span><\/p>\n The hoaxer claimed that approximately 80% of the article was created using GPT-4, and the image generator Dalle-E 2 was used to create a profile picture of the imaginary author.<\/span><\/p>\n The persona was designed to embody the quintessential \u201cwoke\u201d journalist \u2013 a woman depicted as overweight, with blue hair, wearing business casual clothing, and a smug expression.<\/span><\/p>\n The goal of the hoax, according to the person behind it, was to amuse their friends and provoke debate about identity politics.<\/span><\/p>\n They defended their actions, stating that they didn’t see themselves as an “alt-right troll,” but rather as someone who believed identity politics to be an unhelpful lens through which to view the world.<\/span><\/p>\n This incident has sparked international interest and caused a stir in the Irish media. It is one of the first instances of an AI-authored hoax reaching global news since the emergence of AI writing tools such as ChatGPT.<\/span><\/p>\n However, it’s not the first time AI content has been published unknowingly or even intentionally by media outlets.<\/span><\/p>\n NewsGuard, a misinformation watchdog, recently identified nearly 50 websites in seven languages covertly printing AI-generated content.<\/span><\/p>\n Meanwhile, CNET was forced to make major corrections to a series of articles written by ChatGPT last year.<\/span><\/p>\n This event underscores the need for robust pre-publication procedures to ensure the authenticity of articles and their authors.<\/span><\/p>\n With the increasing sophistication of AI writing tools, the challenge posed by AI to journalism is becoming ever more significant.<\/span><\/p>\n However, readers can rest assured that all content on our website is 100% human-made. In fact, any typos or unusual turns of phrase you may stumble upon here are our creative way of validating our commitment to keeping it ‘human’ in the digital age.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":159676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[411],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-159675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-special-interest"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159675"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/159676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Editor’s Apology and Action Plan<\/b><\/h2>\n
A Twitter Account Keeps the Deception Alive<\/b><\/h2>\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
The Motivation Behind the Hoax<\/b><\/h2>\n
Consequences and the Future of AI in Journalism<\/b><\/h2>\n